Term Limits, not quite working out.......

News came today that my representative in the state house, Jim Marleau, is a candidate for the state Senate. Why not run for another house term? The constitution won't allow it as he has served his third term. My representative on the County Board of Commissioners plans to run for the open seat that will now be open. Marleau, if successful, will replace my representative in the state Senate, who is now a candidate for Attorney General. The Attorney General of Michigan is, according to polls, pulling away from the Democratic leaders in a mock general election for Governor.

Term Limits, approved by citizens of Michigan in the 1990s, were designed to end the run of professional politicians. The concept breaks down the idea of a member of government serving term after term and creates the opportunity for new ideas. Sadly, those in Lansing are not ideal, as the professional politicians remain. Those who championed term limits continue to run for new offices, and frankly, haven't served the citizens all that well in recent years. Does anyone truly believe that by switching chairs that these people will be able to reform and improve state government? Professional politicians still exist, term limits have not accomplished what they were meant to do.

The leader of Michigan's Senate is running for Attorney General. Winning a Republican primary by doing anything that may raise taxes will be difficult at best, meaning he's unlikely to allow any bill on to the floor of the Senate that may raise revenue. The leader of the Michigan House is suspected to be running for Governor, making me wonder how long it will be before he begins rolling out an agenda to put him in a stronger place for the primary election against John Cherry.

Through redistricting, as well as the support of special interest groups, it's very difficult to defeat an incumbent in an election. Political parties, loyal to those currently holding a legislative position, discourage citizens from running against officeholders in a primary election. These factors make it easy for politics to become a career, not what the founders of our nation envisioned when they set up our government. To combat this, the citizens of Michigan approved term limits in 1992. The idea, to end the notion of career politicians and bring new views to state government was supported by nearly 60 percent of the voters when the ballot initiative passed. Sadly, the current leadership in the legislature remains led by career politicians, focused on the next election and protecting themselves rather than being honest with citizens.

In a perfect world, citizens would be elected, serve the best interest of the people and then return to the private sector to live under the same laws they created. This would promote honest, fair, and effective government. Term Limits should take the eyes of legislators off of elections and focus them on issues. If only they were successful.

Thanksgiving - Food, Family, and Football

On the day after Thanksgiving, as I sat down to relax and watch a game, I got to thinking about the deep tradition of college football, part of the reason I love the sport as much as I do. I enjoy thinking and learning about the storied history of rivalries, games, and moments so many have enjoyed over the years.

It caused me to thinking about which games, regardless of ranking, records, coaches, or players, fans watch every year. The match-ups that enthusiasts just refuse to miss, regardless of circumstance.

For me, I thought of the following games that I always watch, no matter who is coaching, starting at quarterback or having a bad year:

Notre Dame/USC
Michigan/Ohio State
Army/Navy
Texas/Oklahoma
Nebraska/Colorado

The Rose Bowl

Quick hits on a Sunday

I was so excited to see an advertisement for the NHL season opener on Versus. Someone should point out to those at the network that next time they make a commercial, they may want to include when the games will be shown.

Can it be the Tigers are playing meaningful baseball in September?

The President gave some great speeches this week. The one I enjoyed the most probably received the least coverage. Should you get time, check out his remarks from Thursdays meeting at the Clinton Global Initiative. If you find yourself consistently let down by government, check out the work of Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), which will remind you that a better world really is possible.

President Bush was at the Cowboys game last Sunday, looking like he's enjoying retirement. Think he ever considers applying to be the Commissioner of Major League Baseball? Selig is on his way out, "W" may be the man for the job.

Starting to feel like fall in Michigan, the leaves are changing!

If so many people detest Glenn Beck, why does he sell so many books and have such high ratings for his cable program? Moreover, why does he receive so much media coverage?

I'll be the minority opinion, I like the new Jay Leno show.

A state lacking leadership

This morning's Detroit Free Press features a short story about a state representative who met with some constituents at a recent coffee event in her district. During the meeting, she proposed doubling the beer tax in Michigan, which was met with fierce opposition. Those gathered could not fathom increasing a tax, much less doubling one. However, once they discovered that doubling the tax would cost them 3.8 cents, and would bring in enough revenue to preserve the Promise Scholarship, many were open to a nickel tax on beer.

If those who buy beer were willing to kick in 30 cents for each six pack they purchase, college for so many kids would be more affordable. Why don't we have leaders that can trust the populace to be intelligent enough to understand such an idea?

Michigan's economy is in shambles. The collapse of the auto industry has put a pinch on every family in the state. We live in times that require leaders, yet, there are so many that run for office in Lansing that won't lead out of fear of losing the next election. This morning we see reports that indicate no members of the legislature (particularly the leadership) wants to struggle with the idea of raising revenue because 2010 is an election year.

Justice Holmes, a conservative member of the Supreme Court, once remarked that "taxes are the price we pay for civilization." Real leaders could explain why we need revenues, as well as make conscious decisions about budget cuts (perhaps beginning with the salary of legislators). Personally, I'd be more inclined to re-elect or vote for someone who could tell me the truth, even when it is difficult.

I pay my fair share of income tax to the state of Michigan, something so many others can say. That said, I'd be willing to pay more if it meant kids could go to better schools, we could find a way to help families send their kids to college, and we could find ways to deliver insurance to those who face bankruptcy if they find themselves faced with a life-threatening illness.

Sadly, in today's landscape of Michigan politics, my ideals won't be realized. There's no one with enough courage to express them in fear they may lose a primary election.

Over-politicized

Next Tuesday, many students return to school to begin another academic year. For people such as myself, there's no better time. A combination of excitement, optimism, and anticipation for so many great moments combines to make this truly, one of my favorite periods of time on the calendar.

The President of the United States plans to address America's students next week. He plans to take on some pretty controversial topics, such as working hard, setting strong academic goals, and taking responsibility for their own learning. This has caused quite the buzz from the public, with parents clamoring they should be able to monitor the message of the President and decide whether or not it is appropriate for their children. The state of Texas, in a move to "protect children" is refusing to air the message at all. Words such as "indoctrination" and "ego" have been thrown around. In this morning's newspaper, the message was called a "waste of taxpayer funds."

While the President has plenty of supporters and opponents, I have to shake my head and wonder what our nation has come to. To take a moment and encourage the nation's young people to do their best and set high goals for themselves is exactly what we should want a President to do. I don't know parents or educators that are not going to encourage kids to work hard, set goals, or take ownership of their own education when the school year begins.

I'd prefer the address be taped - I oppose live television in classrooms - but that doesn't change my view, that someone who is successful encouraging the children of our nation to dream big is a perfect message at this time of year.

Disagree over health care, the stimulus bill, or any other policy you don't like. Bemoan his views on key issues that you see differently. Participate in the national debate. But don't keep your kids home from school on Tuesday because the President of the United States plans to tell the students of our nation to give their best effort this year.

Again, politics gets in the way.

Politics - Ruining good policy?

As debate over the health care bill rages, and as news of the budget debacle in California (reminding me of the last several budgets in Michigan) appears, it reminds me of just how hard it is to forge a good compromise in government. Politics, and the constant election cycle continues to make it nearly impossible to get anything done in Washington, Sacramento, Lansing, or in any other capital in the United States.

Republicans who attempt to forge a compromise are portrayed as "liberals" by Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and the conservative media. Democrats find similar hardship when working with Republicans, painted by those on MSNBC or Air America as too close to corporations or as "anti-Obama," perhaps the worst insult currently in leftist circles. The media demands that politicians are always campaigning, causing many to stick to their partisan ways and hindering any chance of real progress.

There were times in the past in which candidates would proudly pledge their ability to work with members of the other party. We now live in times that discourage such statements. The permanent campaign, set to begin again for the 2010 elections very soon, will do nothing but hinder the ability to make any meaningful policy.

Bill Bishop, in his book The Big Sort, wrote about how more and more Americans are moving to locations surrounded by like-minded individuals. These people are also, through cable news and the internet, only focusing on media that shares their perspective on the world. This thinking becomes dangerous, reducing ideas not to good or bad, but rather "ours" and "theirs."

A troubled economy, unsustainable social programs, war against terrorists, and plenty of other issues face those in government. These times call for good ideas, innovation, and compromise, several methods that have worked historically. Social programs, balanced budgets, reforms, and tax policy have been created in bi-partisan exchanges. Rather than demonizing Republicans and Democrats working together, we should, as citizens, encourage such behavior.

Buy Local!

As you eat your next meal, spend a few minutes thinking about where what you are about to eat comes from. Chances are, whether you’re seated in a restaurant or at your own dinner table, the food you’re about to consume has traveled a few miles. A typical carrot has been nearly 1900 miles before getting to you according to a published study. Atlantic Salmon, featured at eateries and sold by grocers everywhere is caught off the coast of Norway. As Jeff Rubin, in his book “Why your World is About to Get a Whole Lot Smaller” points out that from there, it is sent to mainland Europe, then to China where it is thawed, processed, and refrozen before being sent to the United States.

As I think of the distance food travels, I think of the number of Salmon and fishermen working in the Great Lakes. My mind also turns to the carrots currently growing in the garden behind my house. As the economy continues to stagnate, I cannot help but think of what a strong impact buying local can have in stimulating economies. Not only would consumers get fresher produce, local farmers would benefit.

The concept of urban agriculture continues to grow in Detroit. Abandoned lots are being converted into community gardens to supply the fresh produce restaurants and local consumers are eating each evening. There is also the rise of CSAs (Community Supported Agriculture) in which shares of the fruits and vegetables produced at small farms sold to local consumers. Farmer’s Markets provide yet another way to purchase local food. Studies indicate that 80 to 90 cents of every dollar spent at a Farmer’s Market directly benefit those who bring their produce to sell.

Buying local keeps money within communities and is something we can all do to help improve the economy.

A curtain call

Great news arrived this week in word that General Motors will build their new, European-style small car in Oakland County at the Orion Plant. This decision will create jobs in an area in desperate need. There is speculation this move could also create jobs for auto suppliers.

Michigan is also cheering GE who brought 1200 jobs to the state.

As I opened the newspaper this morning, I saw pictures of Michigan's governor, celebrating the successes and talking about her own good work in helping these jobs land in Michigan. Make no mistake, The Governor deserves praise for her effort. That said, I could not help but wonder, where has this been since she took office in 2003? With so many jobs lost, and coming up on the short end of these decisions so often, I can't help but think how much better off the citizens of the state would be had she been this successful more often.

A practical solution

According to a recent article in the Christian Science Monitor, nearly 100,000 villages in India exist without electricity. The 80 million of those villagers are part of a world, inhabited by nearly 1.5 billion people who cannot "turn the lights on" after dusk. These people are limited, unable to read, or do much of anything once the sun goes down. Those who can afford lighting use kerosene lamps, an inefficient, and for some, expensive method of lighting their homes.

Enter a Non-Governmental Organization, the Grameen Surya Bijli Foundation. This group, as part of the Dignity through Electricity Program, are working to bring light to these villagers in a way that is cheaper and less harmful to the environment. This group has designed lamps, which utilize LEDs (light emitting diodes) run on solar energy. They cost $55 to install (a cost picked up by the Foundation) and provide lamps to these people, which are charged by the sun and have four hours of light.

The benefits to these lamps are countless. It's nearly 200 times more efficient than kerosene (50 times more efficient than a 100 watt bulb for that matter) and are much better environmentally. Moreover, they are cost neutral. They last for years, saving energy and money. What villagers spent on kerosene can be saved and invested in other ways, such as paying for school materials for children.

A problem for the Foundation is importation of LEDs. Currently, they are produced in China and shipped to India. Should the NGO grow and be capable of building their lamps in India, the cost of a lamp would drop from $55 to and estimated $22. It would also bring jobs, growing the economy.

Joining the Grameen Surya Bijli Foundation is the Studylite lamp, recently profiled in Wired magazine. These provide 6 hours of light and run on 24 LED bulbs. These lamps are expensive, costing $33. Should a NGO become involved, these could also be an affordable solution.

This work, a practical alternative energy solution solves a real problem experienced by people on the other side of the world. It's easy to see how much capacity could be built by increasing the hours light is available to these people. Should you be interested in more, their website is www.suryabijlee.com.

Some logistics

You'll notice a few new features.

- At the bottom of the posts, there is an envelope. Clicking that will allow you to e-mail my posts to friends. Should I say something that strikes you as interesting, feel free to forward it on to friends and family. Word of mouth is strong advertising, if I'm worth reading, please let someone know.

- I've added, on the side of the page, what I'm currently reading, in the event you're interested in what shapes my thinking on issues.

- Many have let me know they read, don't hesitate to send me an e-mail should you find something I wrote about worth a response.

More damage?

Scanning the paper this morning, I could not help but shake my head at further misconduct on the part of members of Detroit's city government. It led me to ponder the question, who has damaged the image of the city further, Kwame Kilpatrick or Monica Conyers?

The former mayor's scandal cost the city a fortune, was a national story. His actions cost the city millions of dollars in the wrongful termination lawsuit of former police officer Gary Brown. Coverage of his tirade at the State of the City address last year and his removal from office were a humiliation for the office he represented. After moving to Texas, we're still not rid of Mr. Kilpatrick, his failure to pay restitution to the city keep him in the public eye.

Council Pro-Temp Conyers has had her share of bad press. From referring to Ken Cockeril as "Shrek" to her famous YouTube video where she debates a student from a local elementary school, Monica Conyers has brought her share of negative attention. Her move to shun the plan to renovate Cobo while she led city council could also cost the city millions. Her unethical move, to apparently accept bribes are just as bad as many of the actions of the mayor.

It's a toss up on who has damaged the city more, but all can agree both have not served the citizens well.

Write your senator!

If you could, would you do something that would help lower child mortality rates, improve health in impoverished nations, and help curb poverty? If there was the opportunity to help prevent some deadly diseases from spreading, would you take advantage? 

Nearly 900 million people living in the world lack access to clean water. Nearly 2.5 billion lack access to proper sanitation. This is a leading cause of diseases spreading, malnutrition, and the inability to grow crops. 

How valuable is clean water? Reflect for a moment on your own life on how much clean water you use in the average day. Showers, laundry, refreshment, just three of the many uses of water for all of us in a given span of 24 hours. The lack of clean water makes living conditions tough for anyone who has had to go without for even a short period in the Western World. As my grandfather used to say "water is precious, don't take it for granted." 

Currently in the US Senate, a bill has been proposed to bring access to clean water to nearly 100 million people. While it will not solve the problem completely, it will help. To get to the floor of the Senate, this bill still needs co-sponsors, as well as strong minded Senators to vote for the bill to move to the House of Representatives. 

Below is a copy of the letter that I sent to Senator Stabenow and Senator Levin. I'd encourage any of you reading to do the same and consider asking your family and friends to write their Senator to encourage them to support this effort.

Want to help the world and fight terrorism at the same time? Get more people clean water. It will build bridges.

Dear Senator Levin,

Clean water is one of the most vital, precious commodities in all the world. As someone fortunate enough to come from the Great Lakes State, I cannot fathom a life without plenty of water for so many purposes. We’re blessed to be from a state where we have plenty of access for cleaning, drinking, and recreation purposes. 

One issue going on in our complicated world that concerns me greatly is the lack of access to clean water for so many of the human beings around the world. Geography prevents some from enjoying something we take for granted - clean, fresh water. Hundreds of millions of people just like us lack access to the most basic, most necessary resource on the planet. 

I’m pleased to read news of a bill that could be introduced in the United States Senate. The Senator Paul Simon Water for the World Act, which is co-sponsored by Senators Durbin and Corker will help provide access to clean water for nearly 100 million people. While it will not solve the problem completely, it will go a long way to make an impact on so many in underdeveloped countries. 

Efforts such as this, to help those from around the world who share our common humanity will help create partnerships with nations and improve the view of the United States among members of the world community. As residents of a state so rich in access to clean water, I’m confident you agree this measure is worthwhile. 

It is my hope that you will support this bill as strongly as possible by both considering co-sponsoring and voting for the measure when it comes before the Senate.

I’m grateful for your time,

John C. Bernia Jr. 

Oxford, Michigan

The New Justice?

My personal schedule has kept me away - it's been nearly a week since the announcement and I've yet to offer my view.

Elections matter! It's a point I strived to make months ago when the mayoral election in Detroit drew such a small turnout. The nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor is the precise reason it's important to vote. 

Much will be made over the next few months on her personal views. Her feelings on the court's role in interpreting the law and making social policy will be covered in the media, as will her thoughts on issues as complex as abortion, gun control, and the significance of race. Some will agree with her views, others will not. Some will see her as a champion, others, as a villain.

Having said that, the question for the Senate to consider as they proceed with confirmation hearings is not "how do you feel about her views," but "is she qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice?"

I do hope the Senate reviews the cases she has decided (I was alarmed by her ruling in the firefighter case dealing with affirmative action policies) and how many times her decisions have been overturned. Having said that, when President Obama won November's election, the American people endorsed him deciding what kind of judge and the views he'd consider as he looked for someone to nominate. The election last year determined that the next justice would share some of the philosophies of the new President.  

It's one of the reasons elections matter so much!

Retrofitting

A recent project of the Clinton Foundation has been facilitating the Retrofitting of the Empire State Building. For those unfamiliar, retrofitting is the process used to make buildings built generations ago far more energy efficient. The environmental benefits, such as lower greenhouse gases, make this worthwhile. Buildings use most energy in cities, where most people live. 

In addition to the benefits environmentally, the financial aspects make a strong case for this to happen more often. Initially, there are the jobs created to actually make the renovations. This is short term work, but will create a small stimulus and put some people to work. The retrofit of the Empire State Building is an estimated $20 million job that will give a savings of $4.4 million dollars per year once completed. These savings can allow the occupants of the building to invest their energy savings in new employees, creating jobs. Retrofitting is a genuine stimulus plan. It creates jobs that will funnel money into the economy. 

The Obama administration has proposed using stimulus money to retrofit buildings, a project worth consideration. While some of the jobs created by these efforts will be short term positions, they create opportunities for some to work, an opportunity many are desperate for these days.

What if?

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has found herself in the midst of some controversy in recent weeks for what appears to be a pretty clear case of dishonesty. She took to the podium with cameras on last week and accused the CIA of misleading her about their intention to waterboard suspected terrorists in 2002. She suggests that she did not know and was never informed of the interrogation tactics that were used and approved by the Bush administration. 

It's curious to me that she makes these statements in light of comments made by Porter Goss (CIA chief after George Tenet) and Leon Panetta (strong Democrat and current head of the CIA) that indicate that not only did Pelosi know about interrogation techniques, she did not raise objections when they were presented. 

Nancy Pelosi has gone so far as to suggest those who conducted these interrogations, which they were ordered to do, be prosecuted for their actions. Such a move would jeopardize so many who risk their lives to collect the intelligence our nation needs to fight terrorism. This move is a breach of our national security interest. 

Blatant dishonesty, coupled with such suggestions as prosecution are not appropriate for someone who plays such a significant role in governance of the United States. Nancy Pelosi has made significant errors in the past week. Could it be that she agreed with President Bush in 2002? 

I cannot help but wonder, would the media be in more of an uproar if Sarah Palin were dishonest? I cannot count myself among the fans of Governor Palin, yet, I cannot help but think of the media coverage of her daughter's relationship or her pending book deal. If the Governor of Alaska was found to be dishonest, would the media call for her resignation? Fill the airwaves with more bad press? 

It looks like a double standard to me...........

A reversal of positions

Friday afternoon, the Obama administration announced they would restart military tribunals for the detainees from Guantanamo Bay. This is a move away from earlier rhetoric by the President, and may extend the time the prison remains open. He has made a change, these trials will not include anything that was obtained while inmates were under duress. Yet, the fact remains that military tribunals, once shunned by the administration, will go on for 13 suspected terrorists, and it is very likely Guantanamo Bay will continue to be open after January 1. 

241 detainees will be released, tried in US courts, set to other nations (France has agreed to take 1), or held indefinitely as prisoners of war. 

There are quite a few questions that arise from these developments:

- What nations are going to take some of the 241 detainees? While the French have agreed to take 1, other nations seemed to walk away from the idea recently. 

- If we try some in US courts, and they are found guilty, where do they go? If they are found not guilty because of the new evidence rules (I'm assuming they will be put in place with the military tribunals as well as American courts) are they going to be released in the United States? Sent back to their homelands?

- Where are those who end up being held indefinitely going to actually be held? 

- While the evidence rules have changed, how different is this policy from what we saw under the Bush administration? 

The question of what to do with over 250 detainees who have expressed hatred of America and stated their desire to hurt citizens is no easy one to answer. This is not a case that has a quick fix. The President, who the media told us transcended politics, must make tough decisions on the matter. We must hope he makes the correct choices.

This is not the time to be swayed by polls, supporters, or media reports that have sensationalized some of the details of Guantanamo Bay. This situation is too important to consider anything above the safety and security of the United States, and the impact this decision will have on future cases of suspected terrorists. 

Sports on a Thursday

A simple question today - what's more exciting that Game 7 of a very good playoff series? 

As I type, watching the Wings and Ducks, I cannot imagine anything in sports that is more exciting that seeing two teams, regardless of which sport they happen to play, perform at a high level with an entire season on the line.

A Pet Peeve

Stepping away from current events for a personal rant this evening.

I don't think anything bothers me more than the use of cell phones at inappropriate times. While the rise of the cell phone has plenty of positives, such as use in emergencies or connecting people in ways that were once unheard of, there are too many instances of people using them at inopportune times. 

The other day I stood behind someone in line at the gas station. As the person paid for their fuel and bought a soda, he continued a conversation on his cell phone. The only time he broke the exchange with whoever was on the other end of the phone was to order the young lady working behind the counter to grab a pack of cigarettes for him. Such behavior, in my view, diminishes the person standing before the man enraptured in his cell phone discussion. Was the person on the other end of the line so much more important than the one standing before him? He could not have called back from outside? Without so much as a smile or a thank you, he turned, walked from the gas station without so much as an acknowledgement of the people around him. 

This is not the first time I've seen such conduct. It happens everywhere you look these days. Humans disregarding one another to continue conversations with someone miles away. Couples ignore one another in cars, even people sitting at the same lunch table cannot seem to interrupt their calls. 

Technology advances our society - that said, I cannot help but worry that the increased communication with those who we enjoy speaking to robs us of chances to meet new people and does nothing but dehumanize others when we cannot pull ourselves away. 

It's election day, where are the voters?

"No taxation without representation!" 

This call, familiar to anyone who has studied the American Revolution, characterized the stance the colonists took against the British monarchy in 1775 as fighting broke out in Lexington and Concord. Farmers, artisans, blacksmiths, and many others banded together to fight for a voice in government. Literally, men and women gave up their lives to win a right so many take for granted today. 

Just as critical to the world we live in today is the struggle of women, through the suffrage movement, to gain their right to vote. Women were imprisoned, attacked, and even killed to gain the opportunity to have their voices heard on election day. The right to vote for women came in 1920 - less than 100 years ago. 

Each of us, as citizens, has the opportunity to vote to elect our leaders. This action, especially in local elections, takes no more than a few minutes and requires very little effort when you consider media coverage of candidates. These facts make news today quite disheartening.

After a year of scandal, voters in Detroit have the chance to elect a new mayor and move their city to a new beginning. It's hard to fathom that headlines this morning indicate that voter turnout will be a new all-time low. The winner of the race between Dave Bing and Ken Cockrel will have the opportunity to work on securing a new deal for Cobo, improving the image of a city that has been tarnished, and working to repair a budget that has spun out of control. As polling places remain open, I cannot help but wonder why more people do not take advantage of the right won so many years ago by so many brave men and women. While the election between Cockrel and Bing will only appoint someone for the short-term, it will make a difference. 

Elections are what make us a republic. It's a shame more people don't value the opportunity.

The change we were seeking?

As they were introduced to the press, Tom Lewand and Martin Mayhew demanded that fans of the Lions disregard the fact they were part of the regime headed by Matt Millen. They dismissed the ineptitude of the past 8 years, acting as though they were not part of the process that ended with an 0-16 season. They demanded that the media and the fans not judge them based on the past failures of the Millen led front office, but to assess them based on what they did as executives. In placating this request, here's the best I can do.

The kindest way to articulate my feelings on what the Lions did over the weekend's draft is to refer to it as "Millen-esque." Drafting two tight ends, a running back, a wide receiver, and a quarterback is not quite the move toward the bigger, stronger team we were promised months ago. Matthew Stafford reminds me a lot more of Tim Couch than one of the Manning brothers. 

Somehow, as the draft concluded, I felt as though nothing had changed. Rather than find talent that can make an immediate impact, Mayhew and Lewand have seemingly drafted to purchase extra time for themselves. It will be two years before we can call this draft a bust, giving them more time to be employed and mismanage an NFL franchise.

It seems to me that successful teams build from the inside out. They bulk up their lines, improve their defense, then focus on skill players. How Lions management missed this lesson escapes me.

A new day

James Tate and Charles Pugh, two of the most articulate, intelligent men Detroit has to offer both announced last week they are leaving their jobs to run for City Council. Tate, the former spokesman of the Detroit Police Department and Pugh, a former anchor on Fox 2 News and local radio, headline a list of nearly 400 people who have picked up petitions to run for city council. I see it as a sign that Detroiters have grown tired of the antics of the current city council. 

From offensive comments to the inability to get things done (Cobo Hall), the current City Council has been a disaster. The time has come for change, and I think James Tate and Charles Pugh can be that change for the city, and the region. 

As a suburbanite who has been horrified by the recent work of City Council, I could not be happier to see some citizens stepping forward to take leadership roles. For things within the city limits to improve, ideas must come from Detroit, not from the suburbs or state government. It's with a sense of optimism that I see these candidates stepping forward to take on some of the issues the city faces. 

Does that make him an American?

Abduhl Wal-i-Musi, the surviving Somali pirate taken by Navy SEALs after hijacking and capturing American Richard Phillips is due in Federal Court tomorrow where he will be tried as an adult. The decision by the Justice Department to prosecute this young man in American Federal Court is an interesting one, as it will guarantee him the rights each of us expects as American citizens. 

I cannot help but wonder how prudent it is to give a trial to someone from another nation who has committed an act against Americans. Is this the new procedure for handling terrorists? What would happen to Wal-i-Musi should he be found not guilty in court? Would he be eligible to remain in the United States? 

Just as important, what kind of message does this send to citizens around the world? 

Two things in life are sure, death and taxes

April 15 has arrived, the perfect day for some thoughts about taxes.

Earlier this week, published reports suggested that Michigan's governor is open to moving from a flat tax to a graduated scale that will resemble the federal income tax code.Governor Granholm suggests that a progressive tax system could replace the Michigan Single Business Tax, which was passed last year and has been terribly unpopular in the commerce community. 

Michigan's bleak financial outlook would be hurt by this transition. The federal tax code's graduated scale, where those who make the most money pay a much higher rate is seen by many as fair (I don't count myself among them, but I suppose that's a different issue) and this has been accepted for many years. My personal feelings aside, the federal income tax is unbelievably intricate, and it is this complexity that encourages both errors and dishonesty. The simple principles of a flat tax, where everyone pays the same rate, make it much harder to confuse or cheat. A flat tax is more straightforward and far more efficient.

A more prudent option for Michigan may be to lower the flat tax rate and eliminate deductions. If the rate were dropped from 4.35% and deductions were eliminated, a tax form could be the size of an index card, and could be completed without the help of an accountant or Turbo Tax. This smaller form could show taxable earnings, money withheld, and the amount owed/overpaid. Instead of making the state income tax more difficult, why not make it easier? 

This is not only a question about taxes, it's about leadership. State government needs individuals who will look at new ideas and make things more efficient for citizens.

I'll close with a quote from Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, a conservative, who once said "I like to pay taxes, with them I buy civilization."

Credit where it's due

Over the weekend, my news attention focused primarily on pirates off the coast of eastern Africa. Somalian renegades captured an American hostage, who thankfully was returned to the United States safely. A lot of credit goes to President Obama for approving the mission, which included allowing the use of force. As news of his openness to dialog continues to be reported, it's good to see the President flexing muscle.

Credit also goes to Foreign Relations Committee chair, Senator John Kerry (D-Mass) who is calling for hearings to determine a policy about pirates. Now that there has been a successful military operation, the United States needs to determine if those taken captive (1 in the rescue operation) will be seen as criminals or enemy combatants/terrorists. The classification is important as one allows a trial in US courts and extends rights to those from Somalia.  

These issues are not about to go away. A troubling trend has continued today with increased piracy that has taken as many as 60 hostages. These pirates are young men, those from the weekend operation were all between 17 and 19 years old. Moreover, some East African governments view some pirate groups in the same fashion Americans view the Coast Guard. This is not an isolated incident, rather, something that will require American attention. 

I cannot help but feel that the hard line the Obama administration took over the weekend must continue. A message must be sent that these actions will not be tolerated, specifically as a new administration begins and the world is watching. 

Going about it the right way.....

Yesterday, Vermont became the fourth state (joining Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Iowa) to legalize unions between same-sex couples. While this issue (homosexual marriage) is one that many debate, it's not the issue I'm writing about today. Rather, I'd like to express my appreciation for Vermont going about the process to decide this issue the right way. It was the legislature of Vermont that voted to approve these unions, which is a far cry from the court decisions in the other three states that made them legal. The issue of gay marriage should be settled by states (federalism at work), specifically by the legislative branches (those elected to make policies) of government. Judicial activism in Iowa last week mandated upon the citizens of that state what Vermont's legislature approved - a stark contrast in approaches.

Courts are set up to decide justice, not to make laws or policies. Judges legislating would put many citizens under the rule of a small number of people, many appointed to a lifetime term. The very nature of most of them gaining their positions - appointments rather than elections - should cause everyone to pause and consider how much activism they'd like to see from the judicial branch. Our nation was founded in an effort to move away from a system ruled by a monarch - someone appointed for life who could not be overruled. 

Credit the state of Vermont with approaching this issue the way it should be, through the legislators elected by the citizens. 

Opening Day

Is there a better feeling that a new beginning? A realization that, even though snow blankets my front yard, summer is not far comes to me this morning as I read newspaper coverage of the Tigers who open their season this evening in Toronto. Baseball is back, and the excitement of a new season arrives. Last night I sat in front of my television, bemoaning the fall of the Detroit Pistons when I realized that there was another option, the Braves were playing the Phillies only two channels up the dial and suddenly remembered that warm weather is not too far away.

The optimism that this might be the year, the excitement to see if the new additions in the off season will really pay off trumps the cold windy morning that greeted each of us in Metro Detroit. I'll say that this season's Tiger team reminds me the most of the 2006 team, with unknown commodities such as Rick Porcello, and the addition of defensive minded players such as Adam Everett. Today, because it is the opener, I can hold out hope that this really will be the year. 

Consistently Inconsistent

As news reports detailed the end of Rick Wagoner's time as CEO of General Motors, I could not help but wonder about the message Washington was sending. Granted, GM has not innovated. Granted, the American auto makers need a shake up and need to innovate. Having said that, I don't know that the President of the United States should decide who runs a company. Part of the beauty of capitalism is the separation between business and government. 

Just as curious to me is the treatment of Wagoner in comparison to other executives. Last week we found out about bonuses for those working for AIG, reasoning that contracts established could not be broken. How is it that the executive from one industry is forced to step down while another is financially rewarded? Both industries have been "bailed out" with banking/AIG receiving far more than automakers. How are some executives retained, while others are sent packing? 

Inconsistent behaviors are not transparent, somewhere along the line, I thought that is what we were promised.

Cheer, cheer for old Notre Dame........

President Rev. John Jenkins of the University of Notre Dame suggested this week that it is important to engage in dialog with people who do not share the same views when he was asked about President Barack Obama's upcoming speech at May's commencement exercises. He's right, it is appropriate for those who don't agree in our pluralistic world to get together and talk about differences, in hopes of finding common ground. Those who don't acknowledge their differences and try to work through misunderstandings are doomed to resentment and anger. He's also correct to point out that Notre Dame has a tradition of inviting new Presidents to speak (Carter, Reagan, and George W. Bush all did) to the graduating class. 

Popes have shared the view of Notre Dame's President. Pope Benedict XVI has met with leaders of other faiths, as did Pope John Paul II. Pope John XXIII met with representatives of the Soviet Union in the early 1960s during a clear time of tension between communism and the church. That said, none of them met with leaders or invited them to speak during major church events. No one with views opposite the church has been asked to address the faithful during Easter liturgies. 

Inviting President Obama to dialog with those at Notre Dame who hold values opposite of his policies is not wrong. However, inviting someone who is in favor of stem-cell research and has supported pro-abortion policies to speak at commencement is not appropriate. If Notre Dame sees itself as a Catholic organization, they cannot in good conscience invite someone who holds positions that are the complete opposite of church teachings to deliver the commencement address. Notre Dame has missed an opportunity to take a stand as a Catholic organization. Breaking the tradition of inviting first term Presidents to speak would send a clear message that the university opposes Obama's pro-choice views. 

Earth Hour

This evening at 8:30 pm, people from all over the world are asked to participate in "Earth Hour" where lights will be turned off for 60 minutes. It's an activity that is to unite the world to fight global warming and alert leaders of major nations to replace the Kyoto Treaty with a new policy that will better address global climate change. 

Make no mistake, I'm in favor of less pollution, cleaner air, and more efficient energy production. I'm concerned when scientists warn of a warming trend and what the long term effects could be. Having said that, I'm not quite sure what everyone sitting in the dark for 60 minutes will do to help the problem. Perhaps those organizing this movement would be better served to create a strategy to increase clean energy production or organize better approaches to recycling. 

Symbolic action and requesting government activity won't solve environmental concerns - practical solutions will. 

Sweet 16

The NCAA tournament resumes on Thursday, in my view, there's no better event in sports. Each year I sit glued to the television waiting for the upsets, drama, and excitement that go along with watching the some of the best college athletes in the country compete. As someone who is a fan of a mid-major (Go Grizzlies), I know there's nothing more exciting than seeing your team in the post-season. 

In these times of cynicism and anxiety, March Madness gives us something to enjoy, unwind with, and take a few hours to enjoy athletics. 

For the record, my final four includes Michigan State, Duke, North Carolina, and UConn. 

Politicians, agh!

Following the news this week, one could not help but notice the AIG bonuses that were featured almost everywhere. These bonuses, given to executives making far more than most Americans were funded by tax payers, and were the product of the Dodd Amendment to the stimulus bill that was passed and signed in February. Now, in real irony, the House has passed a resolution to tax 90% of the bonus money to reclaim what they voted to allow AIG to give people in the first place. 

More irony - Senator Dodd (D-Conn) indicated last week that he was not the author of the Dodd amendment, then revealed that he and the Treasury department had worked on it together. 

Yet even more irony - AIG has a political action committee (as most corporations do) and the biggest recipients of funds from them in the past year has gone to - Chris Dodd, Barack Obama, John McCain, and Hillary Clinton. To be clear, the Senator who chairs the finance committee and the three biggest contenders for the presidency last year received huge contributions from the same company that just gave away taxpayer money to employees in the form of bonuses. 

Some critical questions before I end my rant:

Wasn't the stimulus bill supposed to be reviewable by all taxpayers before it was voted on? 

Weren't we told to hold government accountable a few weeks ago?

Is this the "change" both parties said we needed?

In something as serious as spending billions of dollars, shouldn't the people voting on it have read the legislation? 

It's hard not to be cynical in times like these, no matter how much change arrives in Washington, not much appears to be different.

What?!?

Considering the lumps automakers have taken in recent months, Detroit losing the North American International Auto Show would do nothing but further hinder the domestic car companies. Every sector of government, local, state, and federal, should be doing all they can to help the American auto industry be competitive. Yesterday, the City Council of Detroit failed that mission. 

In order to keep the auto show, Cobo Center must be expanded and upgraded. This makes the City Council's decision to reject the recent agreement to upgrade the facility and work on a regional level absurd. The time has come for Wayne, Oakland and Macomb Counties to work with the city of Detroit. It strikes me as unreasonable to take the money of the suburbs, but refuse to allow them any say in how Cobo is run. The deal was a good one for Detroiters, Cobo receives improvements and the City Council would have veto power over the Regional Authority that would have power to make decisions. 

Using federal stimulus money will require regional cooperation, the very same that the Detroit City Council adamantly opposed for "their Cobo." 

Detroit's City Council made a vote against citizens, regional cooperation, and the domestic auto industry yesterday, widening an already large gap between Detroit and the suburbs.

The Primary Arrives

Tomorrow is the day, voters will head to the polls for local elections across the area. In Northern Oakland County there's a millage renewal (hoping it passes) and downtown, there's the dwindling of 15 candidates down to 2. 

As a believer that the time for a new day has come, here's hoping it comes down to Freman Hendrix and Dave Bing. I thought Freman should have won last time, and still think he'd make an amazing mayor. As for Dave Bing, see my earlier post on where I'd like to see him.

Freman's the man for the following reasons:

- A link to Dennis Archer is one I respect and would love to see back in the mayor's office.

- He's articulate.

- He has a plan to use the Police force more efficiently.

- He has appeal to young people, a key to a turnaround for the city.

- He has (seemingly) strong ethics.

- He's an advocate for the city, has poise, and is ready to take on the position.

The new mayor has no room for error. Experience counts in this election - Freman Hendrix has it.

A health care solution

It's a problem, not only for citizens but for every American company that hopes to compete internationally. How to solve it? Here's my proposal.

- Create a medicare plan for everyone under 18. Children receive coverage just like anyone over the age of 65 and would not be covered under their parent's plan.

- Allow universities to provide basic insurance as part of regular tuition, covering those over 18 who are in school.

- Require doctors to maintain electronic records, reducing overhead expenses and making medicine more efficient. This will lower the cost consumers/insurance companies pay for office visits.

- Government would pay for catastrophic coverage for everyone. Few people use this, and it drives up the cost of insurance considerably. Have a non-profit administer it.

- Expand the number of small clinics in pharmacies and grocery stores. This will allow people to take care of small needs quickly and inexpensively. 

It's a start that creates a private/public partnership.

Bing for Superintendent of the Detroit Public Schools?

Financial crisis, low morale, and a poor success rate are all characteristics of the current state of the Detroit Public Schools. The turnaround of the public school system is the key to the improvement of the city as a whole. With the many problems, the superintendent of the schools must be someone with financial awareness, and strong business sense. Someone from the city who has the ability and awareness to turn around the failing school system is Dave Bing. As he campaigns for mayor, he stresses his work ethic and ability to get things done. 

While I believe he could make a positive impact as mayor, he would make a much bigger difference by working to develop a strong system for the youth. As schools improve, more families will move downtown, improving neighborhoods and the city as a whole.

Headed to Dallas

Peter Karmanos should receive credit from Detroiters for the recent decision to offer Kwame Kilpatrick employment at a subsidiary of his company in Dallas. It's a move most have been critical of - many suggest the former mayor should not be hired. To state the opinion of the minority (in this case, me) Karmanos has done a very positive thing for Detroit, essentially buying out the former mayor. 

The only way Detroit can move on is to have an election, select a new permanent mayor, and remove Kilpatrick from the spotlight. Unless he moved away and had a new opportunity, this would not happen. He would continue to be a featured media story and would cause a major distraction. Each day he's spent in Detroit since his release from jail, Kwame Kilpatrick has ben on the front page and the election for mayor has been relegated to the metro section. The time has come to put the Kilpatrick era in the past, and that can only happen if he leaves the city and starts anew somewhere else. Had he not received this opportunity, it's likely he would have remained in the metro area, working in the private sector, and been a story time and time again. 

When considered as a "buyout," the salary and new position is well worth the former mayor moving on and letting the city progress from a trying period.